On Tuesday, January 8, 2002, at 10:08 PM, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: <snip>
> In fact, you need to leave out optional dependencies -- class loaders that > enforce the "required" attribute of the manifest (like the webapp class > loader in Tomcat 4) would choke if Log4J, for example, was not there. > > We should still have a manifest documenting the logging package itself -- > so that *other* JARs can declare a dependency on commons-logging if > desired. would it be a good idea to add this information to the commons site? - robert -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
