On 1/9/02 12:15 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm a +1 on it being in Commons. > > It's an itch that sounds very generic and reusable. Seems a good commons > to me. I think the only question is whether something should move from the > sandbox to commons without really gaining much peer review/use. > > However, it sounds as though Avalon will have a dependency on it, in which > case, should any Jakarta project that isn't in a sandbox be dependant on a > sandboxed project? That's up to them, isn't it? The upside is that it motivates them to send a crew over to help out :) > > The Utils project in the sandbox is a project from which many projects > grow, but it also has classes that belong in it. They're very usable but > should other projects be dependent on them? > > It seems that the obvious solutions conflict with each other. > > Bay > > On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Ted Husted wrote: > >> Paul, >> >> I believe that its possible that not enough of us understand the >> background of the ARMI codebase. >> >> There's a lot going on, and it can be helpful to spoonfeed us old, >> feeble, and bandwith-challenged folk =:0) >> >> Given the other tidbits that have come up in this thread, I would now >> toss my binding >> >> +1 >> >> It's important to understand that the sandbox is open to any Jakarta >> committer, and it's helpful to make an actual proposal, as detailed in >> the Commons charter, so that we know what's what. >> >> If the component is also going to be useful to the Avalon codebase, then >> I would say it has a high potential of being supported in the longterm, >> and would be a welcome addition. >> >> -- Ted Husted, Husted dot Com, Fairport NY USA. >> -- Building Java web applications with Struts. >> -- Tel +1 585 737-3463. >> -- Web http://www.husted.com/struts/ >> >> >> Paul Hammant wrote: >>> >>> Folks, >>> >>>> 2) Take it back to excalibur and just shove it in (where it becomes a >>>> tool amngst many that already have a community). >>> >>> Actually I don't think this is so rude after all. It is not like ARMI >>> was commissioned or solicited for. I'll go back to where I came from, >>> with the official vote being one for and one against. >>> >>> - Paul H >>> >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] System and Software Consulting "Now what do we do?" -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
