----- Original Message -----
From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 1/13/02 7:35 PM, "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > No, we didn't, but I don't believe super-majority was needed. Ted
suggested
> > that this change should be treated as a Product Change,
>
> LOL
Yes, it does seem a little odd. However, the Jakarta decision-making process
does not have a better candidate. From the "Decision Making" page:
-----
Action Items
All decisions revolve around "Action Items". Action Items consist of the
following:
- Long Term Plans
- Short Term Plans
- Release Plan
- Release Testing
- Showstoppers
- Product Changes
-----
Reading the definitions on that page
(http://jakarta.apache.org/site/decisions.html), it's clear that this type
of change does not fall into any of the other categories. So Product Change
does seem to be the closest match.
I can see it now ... a proposed change for voting on changes to the
guidelines... My hair is thin enough already... ;-)
> > which requires lazy
> > concensus. We have that. We also have majority approval.
>
> I guess majority is better than nothing...
Gee, I hope so!
--
Martin Cooper
>
> --
> Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> System and Software Consulting
> "He who throws mud only loses ground." - Fat Albert
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
