> Everything you say is true. What I was trying to say is that an XML You mean, I'm a bit slow.
> parser is not the ONLY way to get a SAX event stream. You can write a > class to do it (I am doing this). So my input is not XML, only SAX. > SAX != XML. > > Scott OK. Now, I did caught that you said (hopely). But don't agree. SAX is XML, Simple API for XML, and from the point of view of the event processor it's all the same what is behind the SAX event stream. The SAX stream has to comply with XML, otherwise it's just an event stream. (E.g. you have to generate matching end tag events to each start tag event, respect the XML character set, everything.) Anything prevents you to generate standard xml attributes (like xml:lang et al.)? incze -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
