On Thursday, January 17, 2002, at 06:38 PM, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, robert burrell donkin wrote:
<snip> >> i had intended to remove AbstractLog (since it's no longer needed) and >> remove the associated test cases and so on. can i start on those or are >> you still working on some more changes? >> > > I don't have any more changes planned. > > However, I had thought about removing AbstractLog as well ... but left it > in because SimpleLog still used it. Now that we've streamlined > everything, that is probably not necessary any more, so go ahead and > remove it (and change SimpleLog to "implements Log" instead). > > After that, I'm going to want to propose a release of this API so that > others can start depending on it. That means we need to be happy with it > first, of course, because incompatible changes later (like adding anything > new in the Log interface) will be frowned upon. agreed :) i think that the log level constants should be removed from the Log interface as well. The only class that should be using them is SimpleLog and they can be added to that. shall i make that change as well? - robert -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
