Hi, >From: Juozas Baliuka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >> >>+1 on changing the interface! The old one seems not to be very useful. Some >>of the methods are not needed! >>+1 For the Exceptions >> >>I hope I will find some time on the weekend to do this stuff. But you can >>grap something if you want! >> >>a) implementing Testing classes >>b) changing the interface > >Hi, >I have a lot of time today, but I will do something else first. >There are a lot of work then I have a time. :)
Me too. We had birthday party yesterday and we drunk about 2 bottles of Absinth (devil's alcohol). So I'm a little blind today ;-). >It is very good you agree on interface reduce and for Exceptions. >It is not clear for me, how self registered will be implemented. I think >it can be interceptors, >I have no more simple ideas for it. Simple to use != simple too implement. We will see. >I need it to know, performance tests will depend on this. >Tests are the most difficult part of this project, because Store interface >implementation >is trivial in the most cases, or it must be trivial . I see this project >is for stable applications and performance. >Next my suggestion will be to remove StoreJanitorImpl or move to some >package like ...cleanup.* . May be it is useful for some stores but it is >very specific. I used "Background Cleanup" for memory management long time >ago, but I cant sent this code for you, >it is because I completely removed it long time ago. Agree, then I will move the StoreJanitor in a different package. Maybe we can forget it totally. I will change the interface today. But I think (as you) the most important things are Test classes and benchmarks. See ya Gerhard "Confucius say too much. (Recent Chinese Proverb)" -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
