Remy Maucherat wrote:
>>So that clinches it. The _initial_ HttpClient abstraction was definitely
>>not informed by Avalon. In fact, we had already packaged Logging as a
>>separate component by then. (Hey, I guess I wrote the proposal. I should
>>add myself as a contributor!)
>>
>>Maybe the Avalon abstraction should have a credit to HttpClient. ;)
>>
>
> +1 ;-)
> Although, seeing all this, I'm not sure I want to be involved in any way
> with Avalon ;-)
However, if you guys tried to work with us from the outset, much of this
confusion would never have risen.
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
