As far as I remember Ceki created a minimal Log4J because there were complains about the weight (size) of the full package.
Probably someone remembers details about the circunstances better than me. Have fun, Paulo Gaspar > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Sanders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 9:47 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: [Logging] [VOTE] Commons Logging 1.0 Release > > > I believe he was trying to implement something like commons-logging that > was as minimalist as possible. It was part of the discussions of the > creation of commons-logging, IIRC. > > Scott > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Peter Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 12:35 PM > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > > Subject: Re: [Logging] [VOTE] Commons Logging 1.0 Release > > > > > > On Wed, 30 Jan 2002 07:02, Scott Sanders wrote: > > > > I'm absolutely +1 on attribution, though, as long as its > > to both of > > > > them. > > > > > > I would agree. Wasn't Ceki also involved when he created Log4jME? > > > > Why did he create Log4jME? ;) > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > > > Pete > > > > --------------------------------------------------- > > "It is easy to dodge our responsibilities, but we > > cannot dodge the consequences of dodging our > > responsibilities." -Josiah Stamp > > --------------------------------------------------- > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:commons-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For > > additional commands, > > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
