On 2/1/02 5:23 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Scott Sanders wrote: > >> +1 about eveything you said, although I think Peter added himself to the >> STATUS file to make a point about the problems with the model in >> general, not logging in particular. > > And if a commiter logs in jakarta, removes all the files in the CVS or > breaks in - it'll make a point that nobody should be trusted ? > > Of if he changes the jakarta-site and adds some inaproriate content, > will that mean we shouldn't allow commiters to access the jakarta-site ? > > Any model has problems. I don't know what's the right solution, but > it can happen in any project - if someone wants to contribute to tomcat > he can become a commiter and play the same -1 game there, as in any other > project. And how do you do that? You show interest and commitment in the community. You have commit status because it's clear you care. In peter's case, he was just making a point. And please : my argument can be dismissed out of hand by resorting to the notion that you had demonstrated interest and commitment that being a commons committer. Please don�t' do that. If you can't allow me the idea that working on logging isn't the same as working on AltRMI, then we can't continue the conversation and I will graciously agree to your point (and go away frustrated again :) geir -- Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] System and Software Consulting "Now what do we do?" -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
