> -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:16 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [Logging] [VOTE] Commons Logging 1.0 Release > > > On Sat, 2 Feb 2002 08:55, Scott Sanders wrote: > > > Explain that then from the perspective of Peter's action. > Which part > > > of the code was talking? > > > > He voted -1 on a release. He stated his viewpoint. Does that stop > > the release, maybe. > > If it did I prolly wouldn't have done it - I get enough hate > mail as it > stands ;)
:) > > > He has the right though, as a commons committer to do > > that. The code in logging can be directly and indirectly > tied to his > > work. > > Or not tied to my work at all and I may just want to annoy > the crapo out of > someone ;) Who? You're going to have to work much harder to annoy the crap out of me ;-) > > > The code talking is the patch I am waiting for from him to fix the > > problem... > > What problem? The problem that you say exists in the commons. > > -- > Cheers, > > Pete > > *------------------------------------------------* > | The student who is never required to do what | > | he cannot do never does what he can do. | > | - John Stuart Mill | > *------------------------------------------------* > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:commons-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
