On 2/1/02 6:34 PM, "Peter Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Feb 2002 09:31, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >>> Avalon is no more or less coherent than Commons. >> >> Really - you are saying that the parts of Avalon have no organized >> relationship? Or that the relationships are *exactly equal* to that of the >> organized relationships in Commons? > > Im saying the relationship between components is determined by the people who > write the components. For instance in Commons we have the Digester that uses > the BeanUtils which uses Logging. In Avalon We have the thread pool that uses > the pool object that uses the Logger. (I don't know if either of these > relationships is accurate but you get the picture). Some components have more > dependencies, while some have none. Another approach : Is there a framework in avalon, and components to work within that framework? -- Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] System and Software Consulting "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
