<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I have a class I'm about to add to Lang which turns byte[] into
> hexadecimal String and viceversa. It builds on simple java.lang stuff, so
> I've always placed it in lang, but as I was committing I realised it could
> be viewed as a codec.
>
> Any views on whether it's central enough to be lang, or should go in
> codec?

Definitely codec (regardless of whether it's merged with HexDump).

- Dan

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to