----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael A. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Morgan Delagrange wrote:
> > > For example, ArrayEnumeration takes an Object as a parameter, but does
not
> > > provide checking on that to ensure that it is actually an Array.  The
> > > checking would eventually be provided when the hasNext or next methods
are
> > > called (in the form of an IllegalArgumentException), but I feel this
> > > should really be thrown from the constructor and and the setArray
methods.
> > > That is, a more fail-fast behavior.
> >
> > Dang nabbit, now you've made me think.
> >
> > ArrayEnumeration actually takes Object[] as its parameter, I think
you're
> > thinking of ArrayIterator.  But you are right, it would be nice if
> > ArrayIterator was fail-fast.  Unfortunately I can't think of a way to do
it
> > that's not really hokey.  ArrayIterator can take an array of primitives,
and
> > there is no specific operation I know of to determine if an Object is an
> > array of primatives. :P
>
> yeah, I think I did mean ArrayIterator.  The simple way of doing this
> would be to use Array.getLength(array).  That does the checking for you.
> It also lets you calculate the length once (in the constructor) so that
> multiple calls to hasNext does not require the overhead of
> Array.getLength(...).

Good idea. I was thinking of object.getClass().isArray() but you're idea is
better.

> > ArrayIterator takes primitives and ArrayEnumeration doesn't.  :P  Should
we
> > fix ArrayEnumeration?  Or maybe we should deprecate the class and
encourage
> > users to wrap ArrayIterator with IteratorEnumeration instead.  I think
the
> > latter would be my vote.  We shouldn't really need to have any
Enumeration
> > classes around, since they can always be wrapped.
>
> There's probably an argument for keeping it around, but it's not an
> argument that I'm going to make.  I'm with you on deprecating
> ArrayEnumeration.

+1.

James


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to