On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Daniel Rall wrote:
> Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 11:41:32 -0800
> From: Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: property naming (Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/digester
> build.properties.sample)
>
> Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> but consistency within a particular philosophy is even more
> >> important than choosing one or the other.
>
> I responded to the wrong fragment of your message -- I agree with
> what's above (but stand by what I said). Teach me to spout
> controversy while still bleary-eyed. :)
>
I'm likewise ok with switching the build.xml and build.properties.sample
defaults in Commons to ${lib.repo} style, if that's what people want --
just don't mess up my ability to override the locations of each individual
JAR file :-).
Craig
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
