> > private methods also begin with an underscore > > I think I've been known to do this on rare occasions (mainly > when there is > some public method and protected/private method with an > otherwise identical > signature) but I wouldn't claim it to be "conventional" in > any sense of the word.
One could question if there isn't anything wrong with the naming of the methods. Do you have an example of such a scenario that we could use to discuss? Ringo -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
