Could we replace daemon with this if this is the case. Daemon is slightly more descriptive than wrapper IMHO.
+1 either way. Scott > -----Original Message----- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 11:39 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: new 'wrapper' commons component > > > > Hi, > > > > I would like to propose a new common component, based on > code used in > > tomcat, avalon and other java servers to work as NT > services and unix > > daemons. > > > > The initial code is based on the wrapper project at > sourceforge, and > > will replace ( and be merged with ) the other components that > > duplicate the same functionality ( daemon, jk_nt_service, etc). > > > > Attached is the proposal, please send your votes. > > +1. > > 'wrapper' has more advanced features than all the other > service wrappers currently used @Jakarta (or elsewhere). > > Remy > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:commons-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
