On 4/3/02 2:32 PM, "Berin Loritsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -----Original Message----- >> From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> >> >> On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> >>> The current model used in log4j, jdk1.4, etc is pull - you >> request a >>> logger by name. Same thing for jdbc connections, resources, etc. >>> >> >> In fact, there's an important philosophical issue about >> logging here as well -- who gets to choose the name of the >> logger (and therefore the log level)? > > In IoC based apps, the container. period. That is what IoC > is all about. The container (or manager) makes all the decisions > about the component. And that's not what seems to be the philosophy of commons logging. The component gets to choose, or that is how it appears. This is teaching me not to jump to conclusions :) -- Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] System and Software Consulting Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it has to be us. - Jerry Garcia -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
