I'm trying to stay out of this debate, but I just can't let this go by:
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm thinking as:
>
> class MyClass implements LogUser {
> // default logger
> private static Logger logger = Log.getLogger(MyClass.class);
>
> public void setLogger( Log log ) {
// should really fail-fast if a null logger is provided rather
// than have logging statements fail at some unknown point in
// the future.
if(log == null) throw new NullPointerException("null log");
> logger=log;
> }
>
> ...
> if( logger.isDebugEnabled() ) logger.debug("Something" );
> }
yeah, I know it was just pseudo-code. :)
regards,
michael
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
