> Now, if we can't meet somewhere in o.a.c.l, I am > happy to do an interface > package o.a.c.gl, which I hope wouldn't be -1'd when > proposed to commons > proper because of the existance of o.a.c.l... > > geir >
I'm -0 on a backwards-compatible change that does not affect performance. I am -1 on integrating this with existing commons components because of the performance impact of non-static Log objects in the classes. This is particularly important since we are already guaranteed a level of indirection. Also I'm decidedly -1 on changes to existing components that do not provide backward-compatible default Log objects. That's a real kicker for me wrt. integration in other Commons components. You would have to instantiate a default Log for each instance of a class, and then if you utilize that interface you would instantiate _another_ Log. That's quite a bit of potential overhead. The proposed interface might work acceptably in an environment that does not require default Log implementations. - Morgan ===== Morgan Delagrange http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs http://jakarta.apache.org/commons http://axion.tigris.org __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
