A few things that could be done before 1.0 release: * A performance improving RFE was reported at http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7519. It looks like a reasonable change, but I haven't yet received a response on my final comment there. Perhaps we should try to get that (and similar changes to borrowObject, etc) in before a release. Shouldn't take very long, but I don't know if I can get to it today.
* Someone wanna add docs? I started on some xdoc stuff a while back but I don't think it's complete. * I added a SoftReferenceObjectPool a couple of weeks ago, but no SoftReferenceKeyedObjectPool nor a SoftReference*Factory. Doesn't really bother me that much, but if we wanted parity with the Generic and Stack based pools we'd add them too. -----Original Message----- From: Scott Sanders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 11:45 AM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: RE: [pool] release - what needs to be done? I think we should just vote for it and get it released. Scott > -----Original Message----- > From: John McNally [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 9:40 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [pool] release - what needs to be done? > > > Turbine has dropped usage of its own object pooling component > in favor of using the commons-pool. We would like to see a > release of the component, soon. The code seems robust and > reasonably bug free, so what do the author(s) feel is > necessary to have a release? What can I do to help? > > john mcnally > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:commons-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
