From: Ola Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Why does the Converter.convert() method have the Class type parameter, isn\'t each implementation responsible for creating only one type?
Not sure, none of the implementations seem to actually use it > The Transformer and the Converter does mainly the same thing, shouldn\'t one of them be dropped in favor of the other? One is BeanUtils, the other is Collections. As with all things different projects can end up with different solutions to similar problems. There is also talk of another interface Morphos which has a similar effect. Actually, I feel that the Convertor code is currently quite restrictive, and I have my own conversion code. Maybe I'll get round to trying to merge with Apache in the end... Stephen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
