Hi, It must not be problems for bacward compatibility in 1.0 release. It is good to have more test cases, but it JXPath is some kind of frontend implementation and 8 testcases is not so bad for this kind of code.
> pff hope you understand my english ;((.. Hope it is all clear what I > meant though .. > > Mvgr, > Martin > > On Sun, 2002-06-16 at 16:35, Martin van den Bemt wrote: > > I will not -1 it, but hear me out ;) > > I don't know jxpath (seen it around though), but just took a look at the > > sourcecode. > > It has about 8 testcases and that is a huge difference with the actual > > number of classes in the jxpath package. > > How can you asure that in the next release current behaviour is not > > breaking bacward compatibility, except for the fact that you can say "I > > seen it work" ? And of course the current release can have many bugs, > > which can only be revealed in testcases (not saying it is, don't get me > > wrong..) > > > > Mvgr, > > Martin > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
