On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Steve Downey wrote:
> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 19:13:59 -0400
> From: Steve Downey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Proposal] Scamp: Source Control Abstraction
>
> On Tuesday 17 September 2002 06:15 pm, Daniel Rall wrote:
> > In what ways does this differ from DAV?
> A SCM system can sit on top of DAV, or DAV + deltaV. Subversion, for example,
> is using deltaV as the communication protocol between its client and server.
> But DAV, in and of itself, isn't a generic SCM protocol.
>
> Certainly CVS doesn't speak DAV.
>
But Subversion does, doesn't it?
There's also an existing Jakarta project (Slide) focused on providing
content management and DAV APIs for use in Java based apps.
> As proposed, this is a way for build tools like Maven, Ant, and I suppose
> others, to interact with an SCM system.
>
Craig
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
