Doesn't Piccolo come out faster than xpp in most tests? -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Work: http://www.multitask.com.au Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers
Tal Lev-Ami <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 18/09/2002 05:36:10 PM: > Performance. Parsers like XPP are much faster than any available SAX parser > (at least that I know of). > See http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-injava. > The performance comes at the expense of full standard compliance but for > most documents that isn't really important. I don't think that XML Pull > should replace SAX, just be another usage option. > I haven't done a benchmark of the Digester it self, maybe the XML parsing > part is not the main problem, but I have a feeling it is. > > Tal Lev-Ami > Trivnet Ltd. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Sanders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wed, September 18, 2002 1:27 AM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: [Digester] XML Pull > > > Would there be a good reason for it, other than because we can? > > Scott > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tal Lev-Ami [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 5:13 AM > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List (E-mail) > > Subject: [Digester] XML Pull > > > > > > Anybody tried to adapt the Digester to work with XML Pull > > (http://www.xmlpull.org)? > > It should be fairly easy to do and there are pretty fast > > parsers out there. > > > > Tal Lev-Ami > > Trivnet Ltd. > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:commons-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For > > additional commands, > > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
