Mark R. Diggory wrote: > 1.) Would there be a means to assign my own properties object to the > HttpClient, HttpConnection and HttpMethod objects? So I could control > the settings on a "client by client", "connection by connection", or > "method by method" basis?
Yes I think this makes sense. Do we really need one at the connection level as well? To be discussed. [I assume you mean connection as "per server" and not physical sockets. Remember: A method may (re-)open a physical connection. With Http 1.1 several methods can reuse the same physical connection. ] > 2.) Is there a "priority" the architecture levels? ie: > > key properties > client --> connection --> method = actually used > > p1 x --------------------------> y ------------> y > > p2 a ---------> b -----------------------------> b > p3 n ------------> m -------------> m > p4 z -------------------------------------------> z > Yes. This is exactly the priority system I meant by "patching" with local preferences. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
