I think I see my logging issue. The wire logger seems to get initialized
without the "base package name". Was this intentional?
it gets instantiated as:
private static final Log wireLog = LogFactory.getLog("httpclient.wire");
It might be better for users of the package who are dealing with logging
issues if this were within the category "org.apache.commons.httpclient"
such that it could be turned on and of using the absolute package name.
IE:
private static final Log wireLog =
LogFactory.getLog("HttpConnection.class");
builds a Logger with the category
"org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpConnection"
private static final Log wireLog = LogFactory.getLog("httpclient.wire");
builds a Logger with the category "httpclient.wire"
it might be better to instatiate it as
private static final Log wireLog =
LogFactory.getLog(""org.apache.commons.httpclient.wire");
then it can be controlled within the same category as the client:
In Log4J
<logger name="org.apache.commons.httpclient" additivity="false">
<level value="error"/>
<appender-ref ref="CONSOLE"/>
</logger>
would set logging in the HttpClient to error including the wire log.
Just my 2Cents,
Mark
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
