Steve Downey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Friday 20 September 2002 03:09 am, Henri Yandell wrote: > > Okay, I'm figuring that 1 and 2 are done. > > > > 1) Decide on what we want to go and what doesn't go. > > 2) All agree that we're happy with the state of what is going, including > > javadoc and unit tests. > > > > Which puts us on to: > > > > 3) Make a preliminery build available internally. I'd like to then run > > JDiff on this with the beta. This hopefully can make us aware of any > > issues. This means having tag stuff in cvs done at this point. > > > > I looked into JDiff, but the learning curve feels too high for the amount > > of effort I want to put in at the moment, so I wrote myself a script. > > Here's the output: > > > > http://www.generationjava.com/projects/vij/commons-lang.javadiff > > > > It basically tells us what has changed. It's in DIFF format [cuz I used > > diff] so the usual > < stuff. It shows that we have a bunch of new > > classes, that the exception classes have had some API change, that > > ObjectUtils has gained an inner class and a method, that NumberUtils has > > gained a few methods, and that StringUtils has lost 3 methods and gained a > > new one. > > > > It's not wonderful, but seems to do what a changelog should do to me :) > > > > Here's a Changlog generated from CVS commit comments: > > Generated using cvs2cl.pl, from http://www.red-bean.com/cvs2cl/
Karl's code is good. Also, I don't know how you produced diffs, but the diff provided by the GNU diffutils package has recursive capabilities: dlr@despot:lang$ alias dirdiff alias dirdiff='diff -drPN' I generally do comparisons like this using CVS: dlr@despot:lang$ cvs diff -r LANG_1_0_B1 ... Sorry if this is all obvious -- I just like people to have to do as little work as possible. :) -- Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
