On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Berin Loritsch wrote: > > Its probably a pity that we didn't agree a uniform approach to this, but its > > too late now. The priority is to document what we have correctly. > > > > Stephen > I don't think this is a problem. The too late now. If we go from quiet->NPE it's a problem, but if we go from NPE->quiet behaviour then it's merely seen as strengthening the API, no one can or should be dependent on the NPE behaviour. Hen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Re: StringUtils.containsOnly Daniel Rall
- Re: StringUtils.containsOnly Steve Downey
- Re: StringUtils.containsOnly Henri Yandell
- Re: StringUtils.containsOnly Steve Downey
- Re: [lang] StringUtils.containsOnly Stephen Colebourne
- Re: [lang] StringUtils.containsOn... Steve Downey
- Re: [lang] StringUtils.contai... Stephen Colebourne
- Re: [lang] StringUtils.co... Berin Loritsch
- Re: [lang] StringUtils.co... Henri Yandell
- Re: [lang] StringUtils.co... Steve Downey
- Re: [lang] StringUtils.co... Berin Loritsch
- Re: [lang] StringUtils.co... Henri Yandell
- Re: [lang] StringUtils.co... Berin Loritsch
- Re: [lang] StringUtils.co... Henri Yandell
- Re: [lang] StringUtils.co... Daniel Rall
- Re: [lang] StringUtils.co... Steve Downey
- Re: [lang] StringUtils.co... Henri Yandell
- Re: [lang] StringUtils.co... Steve Downey
- Re: [lang] StringUtils.co... Berin Loritsch
