"Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 27/09/2002 09:57:21 AM:
> > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 5:07 PM > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > > Subject: RE: [discovery] > > > > > > "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 27/09/2002 > > 09:18:48 AM: > > > > [snip] > > > > Is there an interest in getting it done automatically? i.e. > > > > similar to > > > > Craig's nightly builds, having a nightly site build for > > > > various mavenized > > > > projects? > > > > > > Sounds good to me. There was some discussion a while ago on > > general@ > > where a > > > desire was expressed that the number of people who have > > direct access to > > > daedalus should be limited. Having a nightly site update allows for > > updates > > > for a project even when none of the project committers has privs on > > > daedalus. (It also allows for cases like mine, where I've never got > > > site:deploy to work from my Win98 box :) > > > > Which projects that you work with would you like updated regularly? > > FileUpload and Resources, both in the sandbox (assuming you're going to do > sandbox components - if not, don't worry about it). Yep, for sandbox, we could set up a reactor that works like the one for commons. > > I've got daedalus access, and a Win2k box that works for > > deployment. We > > can take the Win98 issue over to turbine-maven-user anytime.... > > I tried to resolve it over there before, and got tangled up in the > certificate tools. Jason mentioned the names of the tools, but I never quite > figured out how to get it all to work. I haven't tried for a while, though. > If I still have problems, I'll bring it up again over there. Cool. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Work: http://www.multitask.com.au Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
