might i suggestion that the validator component considers asking martin and scott to be committers?
they've both volunteered to help with the release and are commons committers of good repute but (at the moment) their votes are non-binding. this means that you're still 2 votes short of the quorum you need. - robert On Friday, September 27, 2002, at 06:16 PM, Martin Cooper wrote: > +1 > > I think it would be great if we could get a DTD into the first release, as > Taras Tielkes suggested. It'd be nice to see his other comments addressed > also, but I wouldn't hold up the first release for them. > > I can help with the release process if needed. > > -- > Martin Cooper > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: James Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 9:23 AM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: [VOTE] Validator 1.0 Release (Second Call) >> >> >> And yea, my first call unto the masses for a vote on a Validator 1.0 >> release was met with a deafening silence. So second try: >> please vote! >> >> +1: Finally having a release of Validator sounds good >> -1: I have a good reason why now would not be a good time to >> do a release >> >> James >> >> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> For additional commands, e-mail: >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. > org> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. > org> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
