DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13098>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13098 Digester Performance [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-09-27 21:20 ------- thanks for posting this to bugzilla, greg, and thanks for the figures. (i had a feeling that your patch would turn out to be this.) i've thought about this before and came to the conclusion that generic caching the right way to solve this problem. by this i mean that the caching should be done in the reflection layer rather than in the calling component. that way, every component using the reflection library can enjoy this advantage, not just digester. i didn't realise that method caching made such a large difference (but i'm on java 1.3 and so reflection is s l o w) and i'll try to raise this issue as soon as lang is released. please stick around and join in the discussions. - robert -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
