On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Is there a rule somewhere about not having sandbox components as a > dependency? At a minimum, I think you can infer an indirect rule from the following conventions: * You can't release a Sandbox component at all -- it's just a wad-o-code. * You can't release a Commons component that depends on non-released other code. Struts has some interim dependencies on a sandbox component or two, but that will need to be resolved before a final Struts 1.1 release. Craig -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Re: [Latka][Proposal] Make Jelly... Nicola Ken Barozzi
- Re: [Latka][Proposal] Make Jelly a re... Ceki G�lc�
- Re: [joran] example (was Re: [La... Ceki G�lc�
- Re: [Latka][Proposal] Make Jelly a re... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [Latka][Proposal] Make Jelly a re... Costin Manolache
- Re: [Latka][Proposal] Make Jelly... Steve Downey
- Re: [Latka][Proposal] Make Jelly... James Strachan
- Re: [Latka][Proposal] Make J... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [Latka][Proposal] Make J... Ceki G�lc�
- sandbox milestones (was Re: ... James Strachan
- Re: [Latka][Proposal] Make Jelly a required d... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [Latka][Proposal] Make Jelly a requir... dion
- Re: [Latka][Proposal] Make Jelly a re... Costin Manolache
- RE: [Latka][Proposal] Make Jelly a required dependency... dion
- RE: [Latka][Proposal] Make Jelly a required depen... James Elson
- Re: [jelly] build and distribution issues (wa... James Elson
