Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 19/10/2002 12:00:59 AM: > On 18 Oct 2002, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > cannot resolve symbol : class Jelly > > Houston we have a problem, Jelly is currently not Gumpified (because > it depends on a lot of stuff that is not Gumpified either and even > seemed to run into circular dependencies). > > Is there a stable binary of Jelly that Latka could depend upon? Note
If it's a URL, how about http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/commons-jelly/jars/commons-jelly-SNAPSHOT.jar as that always holds the last published version of jelly? > that Latka would lose the "there is an incompatible API change" > warning mechanism of Gump if we allowed it to have binary > dependencies. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Work: http://www.multitask.com.au Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
