*chants* commons-core commons-core */chants* :)
Also got the itch to have a solution to this. If a friend and I can iron out our idea it might be worthy of mentioning. On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Michael A. Smith wrote: > Agreed. Care must be taken when adding dependencies, especially to > collections and lang. I have an alternative suggestion, but want to > write it up as a more formal proposal. Hopefully I'll get that done by > the end of the weekend. > > regards, > michael > > On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Waldhoff, Rodney wrote: > > Personally, I'd prefer not to have collections depend upon lang > > (currently it doesn't depend upon anything else, correct?), at least > > not if ClassMap is the best justification we have for it. > > > > A lot of other packages use Collections, so adding a new dependency to > > Collections is adding a new dependency to a lot of modules. We should > > be very careful and deliberate about that. > > > > > Much of the code for getting all the superclasses > > > and superinterfaces of a class is coded in the > > > upcoming [lang] reflection code. Maybe the next > > > collections release should depend on [lang]? > > > > > Stephen > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> > > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org> > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
