I think in the Axion testcase I specifically added something about the lack
of support?  I know that there will be lots of various things like PK
support that won't be supported.  I will be adding some more tests at some
point soon, should I only work with hsql>  If you put in the axion onces, at
least we can share the same code...?

Thanks for the new JdbcModelReader!

Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: James Strachan [mailto:james_strachan@;yahoo.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:41 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [sql] diff between JDBCMetaData and MetaDataReader?


RE: [sql] diff between JDBCMetaData and MetaDataReader?Hi Eric

I've added your test cases (after renaming MetadataReader ->
JdbcModelReader) to CVS. They now appear to work fine against CVS HEAD. I'll
commit the Axion test case once it works against the Axion db (it should
hopefully support primary keys soon...)

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:02 PM
  Subject: RE: [sql] diff between JDBCMetaData and MetaDataReader?


  Argh x 2 then...  I am going to stop doing work and wait until someone can
give me a clear direction on what the future of the SQL package is for
MetadataReader, and what (hopefully ;-) ) it's timeline is.

  I finished adding to MetadataReader support for Primary Keys and Foreign
Keys, as well as testcases for MetadataReader and Axion and HsqlDb
databases.  I also tweaked DataSourceWrapper, and Table.

  I am attaching my cvs diff - u in an attachement to this email plus my
testcases.  Hopefully some of this code that I have worked on can be useful
in the future.  

  Eric Pugh 

  -----Original Message----- 
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:scaswel2@;bellsouth.net] 
  Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:42 AM 
  To: Jakarta Commons Developers List 
  Subject: Re: [sql] diff between JDBCMetaData and MetaDataReader? 



  io/MetadataReader.java is going away 

  > 
  > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  > Date: 2002/10/23 Wed AM 08:16:09 EDT 
  > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  > Subject: [sql] diff between JDBCMetaData and MetaDataReader? 
  > 
  > Hi all, 
  > 
  > I am trying to move forward with decoupling the metadata and the xml 
  > representation of that metadata for the SQL package.  I have attached a 
  > patch that makes the code at least compile.  However, I was getting
ready to 
  > write a testcase, and noticed that for all intents and purposes, 
  > io/MetaDataReader.java and datamodel/JDBCMetaData.java seem the same!
So 
  > which one is going to be sticking around? I notice the ant task uses the

  > datamodel/JDBCMetaData.java class.  Or am I missing something? 
  > 
  > Eric Pugh 
  > 
  > 



  -- 
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> 
  For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org> 

   



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--


  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
  For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>

Reply via email to