I have a class similar to this one too. It is part of a replecement of resource bundle, and allows XML resource bundles. So there is definitely evidence of common code.
However, this class is - too specific for [collections] - too XML for [collections] - not a collection (Its not a List/Map) You may want to have a look at the [resources] project in the sandbox via CVS. I haven't looked in great detail, but it does seem to cover the same ground. (Note to self, get [resources] sorted out at some point...) Stephen ----- Original Message ----- From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > It's a good idea Jeff, and the xml.commons people may be interested, > though they don't tend to view Commons in quite that way, but: > > import javax.xml.*; > import javax.xml.parsers.*; > import javax.xml.transform.*; > import org.w3c.dom.*; > import org.xml.sax.*; > import org.apache.xpath.*; > > import org.w3c.dom.*; > import org.xml.sax.*; > > is why I don't think it should go in Collections. > > My tuppence, > > Hen > > On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Jeff Varszegi wrote: > > > An implementation of a Properties-like utility class that can store > > and > retrieve different data > > types, can store comments for properties, and stores/loads data using > > XML. If you think it is useful, feel free to use it. > > > > Jeff > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site > > http://webhosting.yahoo.com > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
