I'm all for having consistent javadoc. Feel like writing up the 'rules' for the javadoc style you've ended up on? [From the files often changed I suspect I'm the biggest offender and I'd like to stop offending :)]
Or is it just that I'm not doing the sun how to write javadoc properly? I did discover a years-long misunderstanding I've been labouring under a while back :) Hen On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Fredrik Westermarck wrote: > Stephen Colebourne wrote: > > Patch applied. (We haven't actually agreed on a format for <p> </p> html > > tags in javadoc, but I decided that there was other useful formatting in the > > patch as well - actually since this is committed, now a decision on the > > style is probably effectively taken for lang ;-). > > When browsing the generated Javadoc I realized that the formatting was > diffrent depending who had written the class or method. Therefore I felt > that it's better to have one consistent formatting, that later on can be > changed if it is needed. > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
