> Sure looks to me like it could extend Throwable.
I have always understood that all Throwables were either application
level (subclasses of Exception) or system level (subclasses of Error).
It makes no sense IMO to subclass Throwable directly as you would be
implying that you had a new category of problem that wasn't an
application issue and wasn't a system issue.
Application code should not be throwing or catching Errors so IMO
Nestable should be a subclass of Exception. Because you likely don't
want it to be checked, it would more specifically be a subclass of
RuntimeException.
--
Mike Bowler
Principal, Gargoyle Software Inc.
Voice: (416) 822-0973 | Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax : (416) 822-0975 | Website: http://www.GargoyleSoftware.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- [lang] Nestable Henri Yandell
- Re: [lang] Nestable Jeff Varszegi
- RE: [lang] Nestable Steven Caswell
- Re: [lang] Nestable Mike Bowler
- Re: [lang] Nestable Henri Yandell
- RE: [lang] Nestable Steven Caswell
- Re: [lang] Nestable Sean C. Sullivan
- Re: [lang] Nestable Jeff Varszegi
