You're absolutely right. --- Ola Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A commons core component has been discussed before. Seems like lang, util, >collection, io and > some more are justified there, since they cover broad aspects of java programming. >This is > something that we (according to the discussions) seems to see in the future. > > But given the closeness between them, isn't it already now justified to manage both >the > o.a.c.lang and the o.a.c.util package in the thought of basic commons component >named [core]? > They are both small and very very very basic. Handling them as two >jars/subprojects/downloads > seems to be so much work for so little achieved. > > I say: let's marry them together. What do you think? > > /O > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus � Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
