On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 08:56:12PM -0500, Henri Yandell wrote: > +1. cjan (my creation) had less functionality than jjar (which was serving the same +purpose), so cjan was eliminated.
That's the problem with the sandbox. Sometimes you have to clean out the place :) Scott > I don't think we care that much about the Attics as it's never been > released. > > Is this a precedent though? The idea that a sandbox project be > obliterated? > > Hen > > On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > > > I am proposing to remove the [pattern] project. (ie. delete all remaining > > contents from CVS, as you can't actually remove it) > > > > All of [pattern]s useful code has now been distributed to more appropriate > > places. [pattern] thus no longer serves a useful purpose. I am unaware of > > any user group that would be affected. > > > > Objections? > > > > Stephen > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
