[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> from: Jeff Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > From: Rodney Waldhoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Costin> If duplication is a concern - then just use >> Costin> beanutils ( however duplication is explicitely >> Costin> allowed in commons AFAIK). >> >> Robert> i've been convinced that beanutils is >> Robert> not the right place for this code. >> >> Rodney> And I'm convinced that lang isn't the right place either. Let's >> split the >> Rodney> difference and propose commons-reflect or commons-reflection or >> whatever, >> Rodney> and end this thread. >> > Jeff> As I think several people have pointed out, isn't that what "clazz" > is Jeff> supposed to be? > > No. [clazz] is high level pluggable introspection.
Please stop this nonsense "where it should be". Code will be where people write it - if someone wants to write and maintain reflection code in clazz, do so. Same for lang, beanutils, ant or tomcat. If you don't want to maintain the reflection code in beanutils - don't. You can't block a change or a feature because some other component implements it. The charter allows duplicated features, so I don't consider this a valid veto reason. Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
