> Jeff said: > To say (as > has been said) that this approach is not code reuse but simply copying smacks of snobbery and is > incorrect. It is a reuse policy that allows version-freeze on small portions of code.
Copied code is copied code. It means dual maintainance and incompatabilities. What I have consistently failed to understand about this debate is how commons can ask other jakarta projects to refactor out their common code when commons is unwilling to do the same job within its own borders. Stephen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
