robert burrell donkin wrote: >> We'll not "duplicate" anything - the code to do what we need >> already exists ( in several forms ), we'll just use it ( adapted >> to the specific needs ). I don't think it'll be a problem with >> the duplicated maintainance either - the code we need has been >> quite stable for a long time and I think people working and using >> the modeler have enough experience to do maintain this code. > > since when has it been a question of experience? it's just the amount of > leg work required. > > FYI > > the introspection code has been stable for some time. > > the reflection code - on the other hand - has proved buggy and unstable. > (the problem is that the reflection code in java 1.3 doesn't work very > well.)
I'm not sure what exactly you have in mind ( as problems with reflection ). I'm familiar with the code in ant and tomcat - and I don't remeber any serious problem that would affect modeler. I plan to use one of those 2 - and most of the "leg work" is already done. Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
