Morgan Delagrange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 13/12/2002 03:44:26 AM:
> This is pretty cool. I assume it uses the latest, > Jelly-driven version of Latka? The new code seems > pretty stable, but it could use more testing. :) Yep, using a snapshot of Latka I built when I made the plugin. There were a couple of assumptions the old code made, but it is still pretty solid. I'll be giving it a good hammering in the next couple of weeks. We're going to be using it solidly on a dev project. > On a side note, the old Latka implementation > automatically checked to make sure all variables were > defined. We can't do that in quite the same way now > that our "variables" have been replaced by JEXL > expressions. Any suggestions on what to replace it > with? I suppose we could write a new tag that could > verify the existence of variables... empty() is supposed to do it, but jexl has some problems with dotted variables. It'd be nice if jexl were fixed :) I think James Strachan wrote a test case to show the broken bits. James? -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
