Are there any more votes? Rodney, are you willing to -1 this? At present 2 +1s means we are at stalemate and the users of collections don't get to use the functor code that is available.
Stephen ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen Colebourne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 3:03 PM Subject: [VOTE][collections] Functors, dependency from collections to lang > Proposal: > a) Add dependency from [collections] to [lang] > b) Deprecate the existing functor classes in [collections] > c) Make the existing functor classes in [collections] extend those in [lang] > for easy upgrading > > The functor code (Predicate et al), currently resides in [lang]. It contains > about 50 implementations of functors that [collections] users would benefit > from and have requested frequently. This proposal aims to recognise the > status quo, and provide quick benefits to our users so we can move forward > on this issue. > > +1 [ ] I support this proposal > 0 [ ] I don't like it but won't block it > -1 [ ] I oppose this proposal, because... > > Please cast your votes. I am assuming that this is a majority vote with at > least 3 +1s from [collections] committers (please correct me if this is > wrong). > > Stephen > (I am willing to code the changes) > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
