> Just a thought, but would it be sensible to reorganise [collections] into > sub-packages based on collection type? > > o.a.c.collections.collection > o.a.c.collections.set > o.a.c.collections.list > o.a.c.collections.buffer > o.a.c.collections.map > > The main package does seem rather large.
I think this is a good idea. I have been playing around with some changes like this on my private branch. It definitely makes it a lot easier to find your way around the code. > Or is this too much change now? A change like this would definitely inconvenience users, but I think it is would be fine if it is planned carefully. For example, code in the old position could be deprecated for version 3 and removed in version 4. Rich
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
