I would like to treat this as a bug, and just reverse the order to the 'correct' one (compliant with JDK 1.4 and others).
Otherwise, I think that a static setStackOrderHighestToLowest(boolean) method is better than a system property. Stephen ----- Original Message ----- From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 2:21 PM Subject: Re: [lang] Bug #14357 > I'm the bug-creator and if the usage of system property is unacceptable, > then i'll > suggest NestableException should be changed to conform better to how JDK 1.4 > prints > exception - not just to be "complaint", but just to do the most reasonably > expected thing...which is: Print the top-most exception first, and print the > lowest last. > > /max > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 9:16 PM > Subject: [lang] Bug #14357 > > > > I'd like to get this bug/issue dealt with. > > > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14357 > > > > NestableException [in Beta 1 apparantly] prints the stack trace with the > > most relevant error at the bottom and not the top, as is common in most > > app's. > > > > Does anyone know if this was fixed and the bug not closed, or if it's > > still an issue? > > > > The bug-creator's suggestion is a system property. Obviously this has > > serious issues and probably isn't acceptable. How else can it be solved? > > > > Hen > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
