While you're at it (;-) aren't you interested in a similar benchmark for memory 
footprint too?

/O

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 2003-01-21 at 18:16 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Yes, I did mean the -server flag. And otherwise, exactly the same code
> was run.
>
> Stephen
>
> >  from:    "Shapira, Yoav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Thanks for carrying out all these tests ;)  Just to clarify one thing:
> > when you say "Server VM", you mean the -server switch to the JVM?
> > Otherwise, server and client VM in your tests use the same arguments?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Yoav Shapira
> > Millennium ChemInformatics
> >
> >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 7:34 PM
> > >To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > >Subject: [collections] Map performance results
> > >
> > >I have been performing some tests on various Map implementations.
> > >For general info, here is the code and my results.
> > >
> > >times are millis per 10,000,000 loops, each of 3
> > map.get(stringConstant)
> > >single user, single thread
> > >Sun JDK 1.4.1_01
> > >Windows 98
> > >
> > >HashMap
> > >Client VM: 3950
> > >Server VM: 2360
> > >
> > >TreeMap:
> > >Client VM: 7250
> > >Server VM: 3130
> > >
> > >LinkedHashMap: (1.4)
> > >Client VM: 4830
> > >Server VM: 3070
> > >
> > >Unmodifiable wrapped HashMap:
> > >Client VM: 4450
> > >Server VM: 2530
> > >
> > >Synchronized wrapped HashMap:
> > >Client VM: 4390
> > >Server VM: 2580
> > >
> > >FastHashMap:
> > >Client VM: 7250
> > >Server VM: 3130
> > >
> > >SequencedHashMap:
> > >Client VM: 4940
> > >Server VM: 2690
> > >
> > >StaticBucketMap:
> > >Client VM: 6200
> > >Server VM: 4670
> > >
> > >DoubleOrderedMap:
> > >Client VM: 8350
> > >Server VM: 2960
> > >
> > >Stephen
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to