There are still a bunch of classes that are in both HttpClient and
Slide. In particular:
Base64.java
HttpsURL.java
HttpURL.java
URIException.java
URI.java
URIUtil.java
URLUtil.java
First of all, I think these should come out of Slide as part of their
migration to commons-httpclient which is still underway.
Second, I thnk that these classes are too general to be part of
HttpClient. They have use well beyond a http client, and so should be
available to other packages without requiring the commons-httpclient.jar.
Do people agree with me? If so, any idea where these could go? Perhaps
the root of org.apache.commons? or a new commons-net package? put
Base64 in commons-lang, and create a new commons-uri package?
If we do this, would it be better for HttpClient to roll the classes
into the commons-httpclient.jar, or require it as a dependancy?
Any comments would be helpful.
Jandalf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: more common classes need a home Jeffrey Dever
- Re: more common classes need a home Tomasz Pik
- [net] name clash? (Was: more common classes need ... Henri Yandell
- RE: more common classes need a home Tim Vernum
- Re: more common classes need a home Jeffrey Dever
- [codec] RE: more common classes need a home O'brien, Tim
- Re: [codec] RE: more common classes need a ... Jeffrey Dever
- Re: [codec] RE: more common classes ne... Henri Yandell
- Re: [codec] RE: more common classes need a ... Ortwin Gl�ck
- Re: [codec] RE: more common classes need a ... Scott Sanders
- RE: [codec] RE: more common classes ne... O'brien, Tim
