On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Avalon has worked with Jakarta Commons so that we are able to move the > projects that now rely on Excalibur CLI to Commons CLI, so remember your > customers ;-) There can be no favouritism comrade. > One point that we would like to see is that commons logging is never a > *hard* dependency. That means that if commons logging is not in the > classpath, the package should be able to work correctly, even if with > logging disabled. Please justify this. Is it solely because you have people who refuse to go near commons-logging, or is there a technical reason? Or just lots of technical-grumbles about commons-logging? Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
